The short answer is perhaps. Legally, ICOs have existed in an amazingly hazy area since contentions can be made both for and against the way that they’re quite recently new, unregulated budgetary assets. The SEC’s current choice, nonetheless, has since figured out how to clear up some of that hazy area. Sometimes, the token is essentially an utility token, which means it gives the proprietor access to a particular convention or network; in this way it may not be named a monetary security. Then again, if the token is a value token, implying that it’s just reason for existing is to acknowledge in esteem, at that point it looks significantly more like a security.
While numerous people buy tokens to get to the fundamental platform at some future point in time, it’s hard to discredit most token buys are for theoretical investment purposes. This is anything but difficult to discover given the valuation figures for some tasks that still can’t seem to discharge a business item.
The SEC choice may have given some clearness to the status of utility versus security tokens; in any case, there are still a lot of space for testing the limits of legalities. For the present, and until the point when promote regulatory cutoff points are forced, business people will keep on taking favorable position of this new wonder.